{"id":16562,"date":"2026-07-17T14:09:02","date_gmt":"2026-07-17T14:09:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/?p=16562"},"modified":"2026-07-17T14:10:02","modified_gmt":"2026-07-17T14:10:02","slug":"rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/","title":{"rendered":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el informe t\u00e9cnico elaborado por el Instituto Nacional de Investigaci\u00f3n y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)<\/strong>, que desaconsej\u00f3 modificar la normativa vigente por considerar que un incremento del porcentaje autorizado implicar\u00eda una mayor presi\u00f3n pesquera sobre los stocks de calamar durante los per\u00edodos en los que la pesca dirigida permanece cerrada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La solicitud empresaria hab\u00eda sido analizada previamente por el CFP, que requiri\u00f3 una opini\u00f3n t\u00e9cnica al INIDEP. <strong>La CAABPA argument\u00f3 que el aumento del l\u00edmite permitir\u00eda fortalecer la captura nacional del recurso frente a la presi\u00f3n ejercida por las flotas extranjeras<\/strong> que operan fuera de la Zona Econ\u00f3mica Exclusiva y mejorar el aprovechamiento del calamar en aquellos momentos y \u00e1reas donde coincide espacialmente con la merluza, haciendo inevitable parte de su captura por la flota arrastrera.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sin embargo, <strong>el organismo cient\u00edfico sostuvo que el actual l\u00edmite del 20% constituye el m\u00e1ximo admisible para compatibilizar la operatoria de la flota merlucera con la conservaci\u00f3n del recurso<\/strong>. Seg\u00fan el informe, durante los per\u00edodos de veda la captura de calamar debe mantenerse restringida, independientemente del tipo de flota o del arte de pesca utilizado, ya que esas restricciones forman parte del esquema de manejo destinado a garantizar la sustentabilidad de la especie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El INIDEP record\u00f3 que las vedas y las \u00e1reas de manejo buscan proteger tanto a los ejemplares juveniles, antes de alcanzar la madurez sexual, como a los reproductores que deben escapar a la pesca para asegurar el reclutamiento de futuras generaciones. En ese contexto, advirti\u00f3 que elevar el porcentaje de captura incidental fuera de la temporada habilitada incrementar\u00eda la mortalidad sobre las fases m\u00e1s vulnerables del ciclo biol\u00f3gico del recurso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El informe tambi\u00e9n se\u00f1ala que, antes de la apertura de la temporada de pesca, la mayor parte de los ejemplares de los stocks Sudpatag\u00f3nico y Bonaerense-Norpatag\u00f3nico a\u00fan son inmaduros, mientras que, una vez finalizada la temporada, resulta necesario preservar los reproductores remanentes para garantizar una reproducci\u00f3n efectiva.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Con esos fundamentos, <strong>el INIDEP concluy\u00f3 que aumentar el l\u00edmite permitido del 20% al 30% &#8220;representar\u00eda un aumento injustificado de la mortalidad por pesca fuera de la temporada habilitada&#8221; <\/strong>y no contribuir\u00eda a la sostenibilidad de los stocks de calamar. Sobre la base de ese dictamen, el Consejo Federal Pesquero resolvi\u00f3 no hacer lugar a la petici\u00f3n de la CAABPA e instruy\u00f3 a la Coordinaci\u00f3n Institucional del organismo para comunicar formalmente la decisi\u00f3n a la c\u00e1mara empresaria.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":16563,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,10],"tags":[2966,726,91,116,2965],"class_list":["post-16562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-actualidad","category-featured","tag-by-catch-2","tag-calamar","tag-featured","tag-merluza","tag-pesca-incidental"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"redaccion\"\/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Parte de pesca - Novedades de la pesca sin filtro\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1240\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"827\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BlogPosting\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#blogposting\",\"name\":\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca\",\"headline\":\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/author\\\/redaccion\\\/#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg\",\"width\":1240,\"height\":827},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Actualidad, FEATURED, by-catch, calamar, featured, merluza, pesca incidental\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/temas\\\/actualidad\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Actualidad\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/temas\\\/actualidad\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Actualidad\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/temas\\\/actualidad\\\/\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/temas\\\/actualidad\\\/#listItem\",\"name\":\"Actualidad\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Parte de pesca\",\"description\":\"Novedades de la pesca sin filtro\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/03\\\/logoparte.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#organizationLogo\",\"width\":654,\"height\":402},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#organizationLogo\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/author\\\/redaccion\\\/#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/author\\\/redaccion\\\/\",\"name\":\"redaccion\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#authorImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/573f0a5081c0a61fd6ac39287b5e137712bd2c79944a96eca6e6fe1474d00d0a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"redaccion\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca\",\"description\":\"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\\u00fan. La decisi\\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/author\\\/redaccion\\\/#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/author\\\/redaccion\\\/#author\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#mainImage\",\"width\":1240,\"height\":827},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\\\/#mainImage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/\",\"name\":\"Parte de pesca\",\"description\":\"Novedades de la pesca sin filtro\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/partedepesca.com.ar\\\/d\\\/#organization\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca","description":"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el","canonical_url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#blogposting","name":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca","headline":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/author\/redaccion\/#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/#organization"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg","width":1240,"height":827},"datePublished":"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00","inLanguage":"es-AR","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#webpage"},"articleSection":"Actualidad, FEATURED, by-catch, calamar, featured, merluza, pesca incidental"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/#listItem","name":"Actualidad"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/#listItem","position":2,"name":"Actualidad","item":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#listItem","name":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#listItem","position":3,"name":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/#listItem","name":"Actualidad"}}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/#organization","name":"Parte de pesca","description":"Novedades de la pesca sin filtro","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/logoparte.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#organizationLogo","width":654,"height":402},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#organizationLogo"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/author\/redaccion\/#author","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/author\/redaccion\/","name":"redaccion","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#authorImage","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/573f0a5081c0a61fd6ac39287b5e137712bd2c79944a96eca6e6fe1474d00d0a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"redaccion"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/","name":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca","description":"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el","inLanguage":"es-AR","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/author\/redaccion\/#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/author\/redaccion\/#author"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#mainImage","width":1240,"height":827},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/#mainImage"},"datePublished":"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/#website","url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/","name":"Parte de pesca","description":"Novedades de la pesca sin filtro","inLanguage":"es-AR","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/#organization"}}]},"og:locale":"es_ES","og:site_name":"Parte de pesca - Novedades de la pesca sin filtro","og:type":"article","og:title":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca","og:description":"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el","og:url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/","og:image":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg","og:image:width":1240,"og:image:height":827,"article:published_time":"2026-07-17T14:09:02+00:00","article:modified_time":"2026-07-17T14:10:02+00:00","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:title":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros - Parte de pesca","twitter:description":"El Consejo Federal Pesquero (CFP) resolvi\u00f3 rechazar el pedido presentado por la C\u00e1mara Argentina de Armadores de Buques Pesqueros de Altura (CAABPA) para elevar del 20% al 30% el l\u00edmite de captura incidental de calamar permitido a los buques arrastreros que operan sobre merluza com\u00fan. La decisi\u00f3n fue adoptada por unanimidad luego de analizar el","twitter:image":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/buques-07-ponte-de-rande-01.jpg"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"16562","title":"#post_title #separator_sa #site_title","description":"#post_excerpt","keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"BlogPosting","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"schemas":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":{"subject":"","preview":"","content":""},"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"created":"2026-07-16 21:54:22","updated":"2026-07-17 14:10:13","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/\" title=\"Actualidad\">Actualidad<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tRechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d"},{"label":"Actualidad","link":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/temas\/actualidad\/"},{"label":"Rechazaron pedido de aumentar el by-catch de calamar para buques arrastreros","link":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/rechazaron-pedido-de-aumentar-el-by-catch-de-calamar-para-buques-arrastreros\/"}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16562"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16565,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16562\/revisions\/16565"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16563"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/partedepesca.com.ar\/d\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}